Skip to content
Our website will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT Wednesday 20 November until 9:00 GMT Monday 25 November while we carry out important upgrades.

If you plan to update your membership, book an event or access APM Learning, APM Community or use other resources, please do this outside of these dates.

The 15 November Chartered Project Professional submission date is unaffected.

Thank you for your patience.
Added to your CPD log

View or edit this activity in your CPD log.

Go to My CPD Only APM members have access to CPD features Become a member Already added to CPD log

View or edit this activity in your CPD log.

Go to My CPD
Login to bookmark this
Added to your Saved Content Go to my Saved Content

Contracting for Performance

Classic project objectives are set in terms of cost, time and performance. Bringing it in on time and to budget are risk management achievements which are internal to the project.

Performance starts before there is a project and continues after the project is complete. Managing risks to performance is a subtler aspect of project management, while within business-as-usual organisations the delivery of performance is a key issue on scales ranging from the individual to the whole business.

  • For many people working within project management, understanding the risks to performance is by no means straightforward. For example:
  • When we talk about performance, do we mean meeting objectives and delivering a ‘fit-for-purpose’ product?
  • Is performance all about quality, audits, KPIs or KRIs?
  • Do we have agreed definitions for performance?
  • How should we measure performance?
  • Do we know what the risks to performance are?

Exploring the issues around risk to performance

  • The Association for Project Management Risk Specific Interest Group (SIG) held a one day event with the Institute of Risk Management (IRM) in July 2009 to explore these issues. The specific objectives for the event were:
  • to explore what good practice meant in three areas: risk management, performance management and benefits realisation management;
  • to explore how these three areas differed and to explore the lessons that attendees could learn from each area;
  • to consider whether they should be brought together to form a single discipline or not.

The presenters for the event were:

  • David Chard, Principal Consultant at OTC Optima Ltd;
  • John Knott, Principal Consultant, John Knott Associates;
  • Peter Campbell, Director Risk Advantage Ltd and Chair of the APM Risk SIG;
  • Val Jonas, CEO of Risk Decisions Ltd, and;
  • Matthew Leitch, Principal Consultant with Internal Controls Design

Andy Garlick, independent risk Consultant with The Risk Agenda and PPP Secretary for the Institute of Risk Management opened the event by posing three questions:

  • How well do we deal with risk to performance?
  • Is what we do worth the effort?
  • Is there scope for improvement?

To illustrate the scale of the challenge – and the opportunities – facing organisations running projects, Andy said that for every 100 projects:

  • 40% (40 projects) failed to deliver – these were cancelled or faced serious delivery problems;
  • 40% of the rest (25 projects) failed to be accepted by business users;
  • 40% of the rest (15 projects) failed to generate the expected benefits, and;
  • Just 20% (20 projects) delivered the planned benefits.
Download the full report