Skip to content
Our website will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT Wednesday 20 November until 9:00 GMT Monday 25 November while we carry out important upgrades.

If you plan to update your membership, book an event or access APM Learning, APM Community or use other resources, please do this outside of these dates.

The 15 November Chartered Project Professional submission date is unaffected.

Thank you for your patience.

Project success: collaboration is the only credible way forward

Added to your CPD log

View or edit this activity in your CPD log.

Go to My CPD Only APM members have access to CPD features Become a member Already added to CPD log

View or edit this activity in your CPD log.

Go to My CPD
Login to bookmark this
Added to your Saved Content Go to my Saved Content

In a ‘first of its type’ event for APM, breakfast with 17 industry leaders in the PPM world tested the latest APM research on Conditions for Project Success as a part of our journey to APM’s vision statement: ‘A world in which all projects succeed’.

It was very interesting to see how closely APM’s independent research aligned with, and developed further, the findings of NAO Reports of December 2011 on Initiating Successful Projects and of Oct 2014 on Lessons from Major Rail Infrastructure Programmes. APM Research identified the ‘top 5’ as: Thoroughly prepared Project planning and review; Clear goals and objectives; Effective governance; Competent project teams; and Enduring stakeholder Commitment to Project Success.

The three most striking aspects of the discussion (for me) were: A. It is all about the people – their competence/professionalism and behaviours; B. In the increasingly complex world of PPM (scope, environment and technology), collaboration is the only credible way forward; and C. Client and delivery teams are dependent on one another’s clarity and competence of roles and responsibilities for success. 

The final point is a real issue. A lot of talk around the table focused on removing ambiguity and uncertainty upfront, particularly on the client side. The general feeling was that we need a more integrated approach to better inform and embolden clients to listen and act (early on). In other words: the continuum between the client, project manager and project management and how we build a single community around that.

So where next? Has the research report got it right? And, if so, how do we learn from this experience and what should be our priorities for taking this forward? In the wake of the Olympics and (emerging success) ‘mega programmes’ such as Crossrail and Thames Tideway Tunnels, the capturing and sharing of these and other successes presents us with some ambitious challenges. 

But project management is a pan-sector competence area and we must not limit ourselves to one story – or one sector only.

 

1 comments

Join the conversation!

Log in to post a comment, or create an account if you don't have one already.

  1. Keith Gray
    Keith Gray 18 May 2015, 04:08 PM

    Sirs, I thought the research conducted by BMG to be reflective of my experiences working on projects in Europe, mostly UK. However, I have spent the last two and a half years in an African country and practices there differ somewhat although I believe the 12 success factors are valid anywhere. I was on the Governance SIG for a short period and there was talk at the time of the ethical dimension when it came to certain parts of the world away from Europe and North America. I am studying for a PhD and one of my themes is the extent to which good governance is present on projects correlated to project success, from the African perspective. Is it the future intention of the Governance SIG to sponsor a short study to explore such a correlation? I would be happy to discuss. Keith Gray